Monday , 20 October 2025
Home Health Restless Legs Treatment Slashes Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease
Health

Restless Legs Treatment Slashes Increased Risk of Parkinson’s Disease

18
Advertisement

A condition that compels people to move their legs could indicate they have a greater chance of developing Parkinson’s disease. A new study also suggests this risk decreases for those prescribed certain treatments for their ‘restless legs’.

Also known as Willis-Ekbom disease, restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disease that creates an uncomfortable sensation in the lower limbs, driving those with the condition to change position frequently.

This is far from the first time researchers have investigated potential links between RLS and Parkinson’s. Both conditions are defined by difficulties in controlling movement, and each is treated with drugs that activate the dopaminergic pathway by mimicking the neurotransmitter dopamine.

It’s been speculated that RLS may even be an early clinical feature of Parkinson’s, potentially signaling the dopaminergic pathway faltering. However, previous studies have been limited or unclear about the nature of any association.

Here, researchers in South Korea analyzed the health records of 9,919 people with RLS, matching them by age, sex, and other variables with individuals without the condition. These two groups were then followed for a period of up to 15 years.

There was a significantly higher chance of those in the RLS group developing Parkinson’s disease compared to the control group: a 1.6 percent chance compared to a 1 percent chance.

People with RLS who weren’t given dopamine agonists were more likely to develop Parkinson’s. (Bang et al., JAMA Netw. Open, 2025)

“In this cohort study, RLS was associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease,” the researchers write in their published paper.

“Furthermore, patients with RLS who were not treated with dopamine agonists tended to be at increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, whereas those who were treated with dopamine agonists tended to be at decreased risk compared with the control group.”

That additional finding suggests any link between RLS and Parkinson’s disease may not be related to a breakdown in the dopaminergic pathway. For those people with RLS who took drugs that activated the pathway, the association with Parkinson’s disease went away.

The researchers suggest there may be a complex interplay of factors affecting both RLS and Parkinson’s, which might include poor sleep health and iron deficiency.

Not everyone who has RLS gets Parkinson’s disease, which isn’t always preceded by RLS. They do appear to be connected in ways that future research may be able to tease out, however.

“It is possible that the pathophysiological bridge between RLS and Parkinson’s disease may involve alternative mechanisms other than the dopaminergic pathway,” write the researchers.

“Based on these findings, it may be more reasonable to interpret RLS as a potential risk factor for Parkinson’s disease rather than an early manifestation.”

The statistical margins weren’t large: the difference in the average time of a Parkinson’s diagnosis between the RLS group and the control group was only a few weeks, for example. However, these differences can soon add up across the millions of people living with Parkinson’s.

It’s fair to say there’s still a lot we don’t know about both RLS and Parkinson’s disease, but associations like this – and especially the role of dopamine agonists on risk – can help shed light on how these conditions get started, and how more effective treatments might be developed.

“Clarifying this association and the role of the dopaminergic pathway may improve understanding of the pathophysiology between these two diseases,” write the researchers.

General Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog is for informational purposes only. Byte Twirl makes no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the content. Readers are advised to verify details independently before making decisions based on the information provided.


Content Disclaimer:This blog is intended to share general knowledge and insights. It is not meant to replace professional advice or guidance. Byte Twirl does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any information presented here.


Advertising Disclaimer:This blog may include affiliate links or advertising content. Byte Twirl may earn a commission from purchases made through these links, which helps support the platform. However, all opinions expressed are independent and based on our editorial standards.


Affiliate Disclosure:Some links in this blog may direct you to external websites, and Byte Twirl may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. This does not influence the integrity or neutrality of the content provided.


Third-Party Links Disclaimer: This blog may contain links to third-party websites. Byte Twirl does not assume responsibility for the accuracy, content, or policies of external websites. Readers are encouraged to review the terms and privacy policies of linked sites.


Legal Disclaimer: Byte Twirl does not guarantee the safety, reliability, or quality of any products, services, or recommendations mentioned in this blog. Use any information or purchase products at your own discretion and risk.


Stock Image Disclaimer: Images featured in this blog are for illustrative purposes only. They may not reflect actual locations, products, or scenarios discussed in the content. These images are intended solely to enhance the reader’s experience.


Results Disclosure: The experiences or suggestions mentioned in this blog may vary from person to person. Outcomes are not guaranteed and depend on various factors, including individual preferences and circumstances.


Copyright Disclaimer: This content is the property of Byte Twirl and is intended for personal use only. Redistribution or unauthorized use of this blog’s content is strictly prohibited.